The US state of Connecticut has officially passed Bill HB7082, marking a significant turning point as it completely bans state investment in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
This decision goes against the broader trend seen in several other US states, where Bitcoin and digital assets are being embraced or integrated into financial policies.
Connecticut Bans State Investment and Holdings in Bitcoin
According to Bitcoin Laws, Connecticut passed legislation that prohibits the state from investing in Bitcoin. Bill HB7082 bars the state from accepting, holding, or investing in any type of virtual currency.
Notably, both the state Senate and House passed HB7082 with unanimous approval and no opposing votes. This reflects a firm and unified stance from the state government.
🚨 NEW: Connecticut passes law to ban state investment in bitcoin.HB7082 prohibits the state from accepting, holding, or investing in any virtual currencies.It also imposes several new requirements on money transmitters. pic.twitter.com/lKozljMp1R— Bitcoin Laws (@Bitcoin_Laws) June 10, 2025
The bill prohibits investment and introduces stricter regulations for money transmitters. These include a 1:1 reserve requirement, detailed risk disclosures for users, and special protections for seniors and large transactions.
Connecticut seems to be moving opposite from the broader US landscape. Under the Trump administration, the federal government established a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve” and held meetings with crypto investors.
Meanwhile, other states are taking more crypto-friendly steps. New York is reviewing a bill that would allow residents to use cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum to pay state-related obligations such as taxes. New Hampshire became the first US state to create a Bitcoin Reserve, allowing investments in crypto assets with a market cap over $5 billion.
Skepticism and Debate Surround Connecticut’s Decision
After Connecticut’s decision, many industry leaders expressed disappointment. Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, responded with sarcasm. He suggested that banning Bitcoin wasn’t a rational economic decision, but rather one driven by personal frustration or special interests.
“The hedge fund managers got so upset they couldn’t beat Bitcoin…” Hougan commented.
While many investors viewed Connecticut as short-sighted, Kevin, CEO of Hummingbird, hinted that the move might actually be a strategic diversification play. He suggested it could benefit Connecticut residents who work in New York City, one of the major financial hubs in the US.
“This is a diversification play for all the people that live in Connecticut and work in NYC. They want their finance funds to be able to buy the BTC that the state is forced to sell. Why have your state government own it when your NYC hedge fund can make money off of it. This is actually bullish!” Kevin said.
In reality, the Bitcoin reserve movement in the US appears to be slowing down. In Florida, two bills — H0487 and S0550 — that proposed using up to 10% of public funds to invest in Bitcoin were withdrawn when the legislative session ended on May 3.
Additionally, in Arizona, Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed two crypto-related bills — SB 1373 and SB 1024 — effectively blocking efforts to integrate digital assets into public finance in the state.
These developments highlight clear policy differences across states. They underscore the growing divide among US lawmakers regarding their views on Bitcoin.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
