In the marketing world and brand communication, few strategies have remained as enduring and visible as sponsorship. Over the past few decades, the baton of big-ticket sponsorship has been passed from one industry to another. The 1990s were dominated by tobacco giants painting racetracks and sports arenas with their logos. Once regulatory constraints kicked in, beer companies filled the void, later followed by telco behemoths, airlines, and most recently, sports betting platforms. Now, a fresh-faced and futuristic contender is taking its turn in the sponsorship spotlight: cryptocurrency.
According to a projection by Nielsen, blockchain companies are expected to invest a staggering $5 billion into sponsorships by 2026. From splashy Super Bowl ads to jaw-dropping arena naming rights deals, the world of crypto sponsorships has exploded seemingly overnight. But as with any financial bubble, there’s rising skepticism over whether all these ambitious agreements will actually bear fruit or simply fade into marketing folklore.
The overlap with sports and speculation
Why does sports sponsorship make such a perfect partner for crypto? It comes down to audience alignment. There’s a long history of trading platforms advertising heavily during sports broadcasts, especially among fans engaged in sports betting. For example, more and more sportsbooks now offer cryptocurrency. According to gambling expert Jake Turner, crypto betting sites have never been more popular. The reason behind this is due to the speed at which you can withdraw your winnings, as well as the anonymity and safety provided. Players can also use different cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, and others. Also, crypto and sports betting share similar demographics—young, predominantly male, risk-tolerant, and deeply online.
Before the U.S. legalized sports betting, fantasy sports platforms like DraftKings and FanDuel blanketed sports media. Now, crypto brands are stepping into that vacuum. The logic is consistent: if you’re a sports fan willing to bet on the outcome of a game, you might also be curious about speculative financial products.
This crossover helps explain the strategic focus of most crypto sponsorships. While there’s some activity in music, film festivals, and the arts, the vast majority of major crypto partnerships center on sports properties.
Crypto in the mainstream
If you were among the early adopters who bought Bitcoin years ago, your crypto wallet may now be holding a small fortune. While most early investors won’t be sailing off into retirement on their gains alone, there’s no denying that investing in blockchain has leapt from niche experiment to mainstream talking point. You can hardly watch a major event without some crypto branding slipping into view.
Perhaps nothing captured crypto’s crossover moment more than the infamous Super Bowl ad featuring Larry David, which saw the comedian traveling through time ridiculing various historical inventions, only to be wrong once again about the potential of crypto. It was a moment of self-aware irony and confident ambition rolled into a $6.5 million media buy. Add to that the renaming of the iconic Staples Center in Los Angeles to the Crypto.com Arena and the headline-grabbing $100 million sponsorship of the Miami Grand Prix, and it’s clear: the crypto industry is going big.
Yet beneath all the flash lies a quieter tension. While crypto is rapidly investing in its public image through sponsorships, many question how sustainable, or even sincere, some of these efforts really are.
The allure of awareness and the legacy of telcos
To understand crypto’s current push into sponsorships, it helps to look at history. In the early 2000s, telecom companies were on a similar mission: rapidly gain market share, drive brand recall, and generate loyalty. They rushed to attach their names to stadiums, sports teams, and high-profile events. The idea was simple: first movers build trust, and trust builds long-term customers. In industries like telco or crypto, where switching providers can be a hassle or involves trust with finances, brand familiarity carries real weight.
Sponsorships don’t only build name recognition. They serve a deeper role across multiple layers of business strategy. By investing in prominent partnerships, crypto brands are not just courting consumers–they’re trying to reassure investors, signal stability to regulators, reward affiliates, and position themselves as category leaders. Visibility equals legitimacy.
In the crypto world, the stakes are even higher. These companies don’t just want to drive traffic. They want to become the default exchange people think of when it’s time to buy their first coin or explore DeFi. That’s why you’ll see heavy investment in performance marketing like search engine ads running alongside the splashier sponsorships. In a perfect world, those big branding campaigns eventually reduce the need to pay for every click.
Surveying for sponsorship landscape
Let’s look at how different blockchain brands are carving up the sponsorship pie. Elevent, a sponsorship intelligence agency, conducted an audit revealing the crypto industry’s heavy tilt toward sports.
Crypto.com is perhaps the boldest player in this space. They paid $700 million to secure naming rights for the Staples Center for two decades and locked in multiple Formula 1 partnerships, FIFA World Cup 2022 sponsorship, and high-profile deals with Paris Saint-Germain and the UFC. Their strategy is undeniably global and aggressive.
Binance, the world’s largest exchange by volume, is spreading its bets across different continents. Their portfolio includes the Grammys, the Africa Cup of Nations, Alpine F1 Team, and the Serie A club S.S. Lazio. Their footprint spans North America, Europe, Africa, and South America.
Coinbase, with a more domestic focus, sponsors the NBA and WNBA along with their affiliated esports leagues and USA Basketball. It’s a solid bet on the American audience and signals a push toward regulatory legitimacy.
FTX, once one of the industry’s rising stars, offers a cautionary tale. Before filing for bankruptcy, they had locked in sponsorships with the Golden State Warriors, Mercedes F1, and even bought naming rights to what became the FTX Arena in Miami. The fallout was swift. Nearly all of their deals are now suspended, and their bankruptcy has left cities, teams, and governing bodies scrambling to recoup lost funds.
The inevitable crunch
There’s no doubt that blockchain companies have brought fresh energy and deep pockets to the sponsorship world. For sports teams and entertainment franchises hit hard by the pandemic, crypto money provided a timely influx of cash.
But as fast as the money entered, the market corrected. Crypto values have fallen, new customer growth has slowed, and regulatory scrutiny is finally catching up. What seemed like a limitless boom is now shadowed by questions about long-term sustainability.
Just as we saw with cannabis sponsorships, where initial excitement cooled under regulatory pressure, the crypto market is poised for a similar reckoning. Already, some lawmakers are pushing for tighter control over how these financial products are advertised, particularly when the audience includes young people.
And of course, there’s the brand risk. Remember the naming rights deals that turned sour? Enron Field, PSINet Stadium, Adelphia Coliseum–names that once symbolized corporate ambition but now feel like cautionary tales. Crypto’s own version of this has begun, with the FTX collapse sending a stark message to both the industry and the broader sponsorship ecosystem.
What’s left is an open question: can crypto sustain this level of brand ambition, or will it join the long list of industries whose sponsorship dreams eventually collided with financial or reputational reality?
Crypto may be the latest name lighting up the billboards and jersey sleeves, but the sponsorship game has always been one of endurance. And like the currencies themselves, how long these deals truly last remains to be seen.
Disclaimer: This is a paid post and should not be treated as news/advice.
Next: FTX to start second round of repayments worth $5B – Who gets paid this time?
