SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw has continued opposition to crypto exchange-traded products. This may have caused a dip in market sentiment, with XRP ETF approval odds dropping to 65% from earlier highs above 80-90%.
SEC Commissioner Retains Stance Against Crypto ETFs
As of today, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has held 13 internal votes, all about various crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs). These votes included updates on IBIT, BITB, GBTC, Bitwise’s BTC and ETH funds, and in-kind redemption protocols. All votes passed with a 3-1 outcome, SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw being the sole dissenting voice.
Source: X
Crenshaw, the only Democrat currently on the Commission, has consistently pushed back against the rising wave of crypto ETF approvals. According to journalist Eleanor Terrett, her firm stance is sending “a clear message” that she remains staunchly against crypto ETPs, including any move toward an XRP ETF.
The SEC recently approved in-kind creations and redemptions for both Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. This puts them on par with commodity-based ETPs like those backed by gold. While this update is seen as a win for crypto ETF infrastructure, Crenshaw’s resistance stands in stark contrast. Her objections suggest she may act as a consistent roadblock in future crypto-related votes, including proposed XRP ETFs.
Crenshaw’s disapproval extends beyond ETFs. She recently criticized SEC staff guidance on liquid staking, calling it legally fragile and lacking real-world grounding. According to her, the advisory “stacks factual assumptions” and fails to provide clear guidance to industry participants.
Furthermore, she also voiced strong opposition to recent staff guidance on USD-pegged stablecoins. Labeling the statement as “legally and factually flawed,” Crenshaw warned that it misrepresents the actual risks of stablecoins by echoing marketing phrases like “digital dollar,” which, in her view, dangerously mislead investors.
Such comments only deepen concerns that Crenshaw’s presence could complicate regulatory progress around Ripple and the XRP ETF, especially if her influence grows or gains support within the Commission.
XRP ETF Sentiment Swings on Polymarket
The odds for XRP ETF approval have fluctuated due to waning market confidence. Polymarket data shows a drop to 65% before bouncing back to 71%, down from highs above 90%.
Source: Polymarket
CoinGape previously reported that after the ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) launched successfully on NYSE Arca on July 18, the odds of the XRP ETF being approved increased to 86%. But during the most recent round of SEC votes, Crenshaw voted against the recent NYSE Arca filings.
Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas remains optimistic despite this. He said that the SEC might approve altcoin ETPs, including XRP ETFs. The reason for this optimism is that XRP now meets the new SEC listing requirements, which target tokens that have traded derivatives for at least six months.
Furthermore, there are rumors that a BlackRock XRP ETF may also be in the works, especially since BlackRock’s Director of Digital Assets, Maxwell Stein, is expected to speak at Ripple’s Swell 2025 conference.
Even though the foundation for crypto ETFs is getting stronger, Crenshaw’s persistent resistance could still be a problem. The coming months could determine how much the SEC commissioner could influence approval decisions.
✓ Share:
Michael Adeleke
Michael Adeleke is a passionate crypto journalist known for breaking down complex blockchain concepts and market trends into clear, engaging narratives. He specializes in delivering timely news and sharp market analysis that keeps crypto enthusiasts informed and ahead of the curve. With an engineering background and a degree from the University of Ibadan, Michael brings analytical depth and precision to every piece he writes.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.
